Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] DMR V D3s
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 15:09:10 +0200
References: <C9D603D2.D950%mark@rabinergroup.com> <FF13011F-7EDC-4542-9F24-91F96ED86ED7@mac.com> <95c61925526faff8ca7d97145c5fb3d9.squirrel@emailmg.globat.com>

Alastair,

IMO the noise it is no too much noticeable and is a nice picture

cheers
Lluis

El 22/04/2011, a las 7:07, afirkin at afirkin.com escribi?:

> Well, I suppose I am about to find out. The upcoming trip to Kenya  
> made me
> think seriously about my SLR. Taking the Leica meant no backup other  
> than
> film or invest more in the DMR system.
>
> All cameras have inherent strengths and weaknesses. There is a  
> reason that
> Leica has stuck with CCD sensors but the DMR does have some 'handling'
> issues. I was eventually convinced that the weaknesses out weighted  
> the
> strengths for a trip to Africa and began to look at alternatives. This
> began seriously in October last year and I have gone from Sony to  
> Olympus
> to Pentax to Canon and finally to Nikon, and the D3s arrived 3 days  
> ago. 2
> days later I had a lens and could begin to 'play' with it.
>
> If there is interest, I will happily 'bore' you all with the reasoning
> behind the change, and the results of my initial exploration.
>
> I have not sold the DMR or any lenses, and I hope to run a few side by
> side trials, both using L v N glass and L glass on both. This will  
> NOT be
> Puts like, but a more practical low gut like investigation, perhaps
> supplemented by some side by side prints.
>
> I will say, that day one would suggest that the sensor handles noise  
> in a
> remarkable way. An example: this image straight from the camera via  
> LR.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/3nr9zwq
>
> Cheers and here's luck
>
> Alastair
>
>
>
>> On Apr 21, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>>
>>> On all accounts the results and handling of a D3s is going to blow  
>>> the
>>> DMR
>>> out of the water.
>>
>> Seems a bit overstated.
>> Have you ever "handled" either a D3s or R8-9/DMR Mark?
>> Have you ever viewed a DMR RAW image file?
>> Have you compared dynamic range or fine detail in RAW files from both
>> cameras.
>>
>> Without doubt the D3s has capabilities which the R8-9/DMR does not.
>> And the R8-9/DMR has handling characteristics which the D3s does not.
>>
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser
>> george at imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] DMR V D3s)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] DMR for sale....)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] DMR for sale....)
Message from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com) ([Leica] DMR V D3s)