Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2011/04/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Quick/dirty test
From: afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com)
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 04:52:46 -0400
References: <ABDC7DF0-6CA2-4B7E-A052-CB7A4866E59D@gmail.com> <84310bd1f18f787a0cf9c97339e597cf.squirrel@emailmg.globat.com> <BANLkTinWpV6GjsbEtG8a0U_1BExH6D5w3w@mail.gmail.com> <C62F0627-DB94-4968-90DA-E1034D16A473@gmail.com>
If you have no interest in 'testing', delete now. This is a quick
comparison of the DMR v D3s. First test is ISO performance. Ok I know not
fair etc.
First thing I will say, is that outside in daylight the differences were
quite small. This series was done inside in dim artificial lighting. The
images are labeled 100 to 800 then 400a and 800a. The last 2 were done
using Doug's 'shoot at 200 ISO and decrease exposure technique.
The series starts here and you can run forward: look at the image large to
get some idea of what was found
http://tinyurl.com/3dem7on
Alastair
Replies:
Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Quick/dirty test)
Reply from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Quick/dirty test)
Reply from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Quick/dirty test)
In reply to:
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] 2 in El Raval)
Message from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com) ([Leica] 2 in El Raval)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] 2 in El Raval)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] 2 in El Raval)