Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I am thinking about how to assess colour tone gradation etc. This was just a quick ISO thing. One thing I have noticed is that the Nikon tends to over expose. Like most digital cameras, I think I will be shooting -1EV, which is what I do with the DMR pretty much. I hate blown out highlights, and on my evening light test, the Nikon gave me green leaves on a tree with red/yellow autumn colour until I cut back the exposure. Cheers Alastair > Obviously the D3S wins at high ISO, at 100asa which background is more > accurate? Top right has large variation between the two... > > john > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+john=chiaroscuro.co.nz at leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+john=chiaroscuro.co.nz at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of > afirkin at afirkin.com > Sent: Sunday, 24 April 2011 8:49 p.m. > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: [Leica] Quick/dirty test > > If you have no interest in 'testing', delete now. This is a quick > comparison > of the DMR v D3s. First test is ISO performance. Ok I know not fair etc. > > First thing I will say, is that outside in daylight the differences were > quite small. This series was done inside in dim artificial lighting. The > images are labeled 100 to 800 then 400a and 800a. The last 2 were done > using > Doug's 'shoot at 200 ISO and decrease exposure technique. > The series starts here and you can run forward: look at the image large to > get some idea of what was found > > http://tinyurl.com/3dem7on > > Alastair > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >