Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/05/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] S2 - not the best apparently
From: zoeica at mac.com (Chris Williams)
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 08:50:45 -0500
References: <C9E3AEEA.E1DB%mark@rabinergroup.com> <BLU0-SMTP7A9583D5854FF56B0DD578C9F0@phx.gbl>

I don't know any wedding photographers shooting weddings with a digital 
Hassy. $30k + is no longer a "go to" kit.

The S2 makes more sense with weddings be the same size as a D700.

Chris

Developed from my iHolga


On May 2, 2011, at 6:04 AM, Vick Ko <vick.ko at sympatico.ca> wrote:

> Yep, it was a wedding, and for weddings, Hasselblad is still the "go to" 
> kit.
> 
> Vick
> 
> 
> On 5/2/2011 12:44 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>> ... And Hasselblad has ruled the wedding thing for a half a century. 
>> People
>> expect to see it. I swear the mothers of the bride know it's silhouette 
>> and
>> expect it.
>> 
>> 
>> --------------------
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] S2 - not the best apparently)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] S2 - not the best apparently)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] S2 - not the best apparently)