Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Field Poppies - where did the detail go/over-saturation?
From: douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp)
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 23:16:15 +0200
References: <CAEve6XiE+Q8Y50s7nbfBi2a=p3PK6Y2PNjo325ur1HahSBF-Og@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks Bahrani,

I'm hoping to work out a way of making it even better.

Cheers
Douglas

On 16.07.2011 21:51, scleroplex wrote:
> brilliant!!
> :-)
> bharani
>
> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 19:18:33 +0200
> From: Douglas Sharp<douglas.sharp at gmx.de>
> Subject: [Leica] IMG: Field Poppies - where did the detail
>         go/over-saturation?
> To: Leica Users Group<lug at leica-users.org>
> Message-ID:<4E21C7E9.7020406 at gmx.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
>
> Thanks to all for the constructive comments,
>
> I put them into practice:
>
> 1) I recalibrated my monitor with a Spyder 2.0 and
> started over again from RAW in LR
>
> 2) Converted to jpeg in LR as usual for the LUG Gallery
> (highest quality)
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/DMS/album150/Recalibrated_Monitor_Centre.jpg.html
>
> Still no detail!
>
> 3) converted to tiff in LR - the detail I could see in
> lower petal of the middle flower in the original RAW
> image is still there
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/DMS/album150/Recalibrated_Monitor_Crop.TIF.html
>
> Looks like the problem of what looks like
> over-saturation and loss of detail is a format
> conversion problem
>
> Cheers
> Douglas
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from scleroplex at gmail.com (scleroplex) ([Leica] IMG: Field Poppies - where did the detail go/over-saturation?)