Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2011/07/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Field Poppies - where did the detail go/over-saturation?
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 16:32:03 -0500
References: <4E1F4CC4.2060903@gmx.de> <CA45258A.11DC0%mark@rabinergroup.com> <20110714233841.117f029c@linux-xljf.site> <4E205EE3.4010203@gmx.de> <4E21C7E9.7020406@gmx.de> <E5F66D54-CCA5-4798-A695-580F92398B57@archiphoto.com> <4E21FF55.8090104@gmx.de>
On Jul 16, 2011, at 4:15 PM, Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp at gmx.de> wrote:
> remember the poppies were in real life, shifting the saturation makes it
> "feel" wrong:-)
Finding the balance between reducing saturation to return the lost detail
and raising vibrance (and/or hue and/or luminance) to then return the lost
color - will usually get me there.
George
In reply to:
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] IMG: Field Poppies - faked sunshine on a dull day)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] IMG: Field Poppies - faked sunshine on a dull day)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] IMG: Field Poppies - faked sunshine on a dull day)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] IMG: Field Poppies - faked sunshine on a dull day)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] IMG: Field Poppies - where did the detail go/over-saturation?)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] IMG: Field Poppies - where did the detail go/over-saturation?)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] IMG: Field Poppies - where did the detail go/over-saturation?)