Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2011/07/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Digital vs film cost EYES!
From: ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:17:29 -0400
References: <CACcosUP8T7uTzLTRM8UHScSNmGeVff8=xQ2H9kLPzBBdi465_g@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8hL-Ej0JLZGSjVcnZEMK9heceXF=fiG3-+RrJPvAKvK=bp6w@mail.gmail.com> <F1B38DB337C24916ADC937E3A7287B79@syneticfeba505> <CA+yJO1CMQpcEdeS4QJqNtvhZSsDe=O8QEtOp_FVkZfPV_9bVSg@mail.gmail.com>
I don't know--Uncle T can get pretty grumpy sometimes!
;^)
ric
On Jul 18, 2011, at 5:58 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
> Number 2 doesn't apply to you
Replies:
Reply from robertbaron1 at gmail.com (Robert Baron) ([Leica] Digital vs film cost EYES!)
In reply to:
Message from lrzeitlin at gmail.com (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Digital vs film cost)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Digital vs film cost)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] Digital vs film cost EYES!)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Digital vs film cost EYES!)