Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The IIIF still works
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 10:49:30 -0500
References: <CAJ3Pgh5cARkXi46c3e_mQyb8LOknDRXxYaCfOXrbMY+HU2Y=OQ@mail.gmail.com><CA4FE1EF.125A4%mark@rabinergroup.com> <CAJ3Pgh4YSMRvkB1t71eKhoYg6JHCq6j_qv5bvbA2gudJ4r2kPA@mail.gmail.com>

Paul said:

"I think one of the advantages the M series will continue to enjoy in
terms of performance is the ability of the designers to ignore the
requirements of AF and IS, which has to be a huge part of current
optical design for the mainstream companies."

I agree with you, except that they must continue to improve the matching of 
RF to lens focus cams, in order to meet the needs of the more demanding 
focus requirements of the digital sensor.  I continue to be amazed at the 
number of instances on this forum  where cameras and lenses are returned to 
Leica for adjustment.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Roark" <roark.paul at gmail.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2011 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] The IIIF still works


> Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
>> ...
>> Optical science has not stood still ...
>
> I had an interesting discussion with a Canon technical rep some years
> ago.  He made the point that most R&D went into not making lenses
> sharper per se, but rather making them "affordable" while still good
> enough.  That reality even affects Leica -- although at a higher
> price-performance point.
>
> Along this line, it appears one of the main advances may be in making
> molded aspherics better.  One simply can't make a top notch, very wide
> or very fast lens with only spherical elements, and the cost of
> grinding one aspheric at a time is even out of Leica's cost structure.
> I think what we'll see, going forward, is the move to more and more
> aspherics -- not just a single element per optic.  In line with this
> thinking, I'd guess that the slower telephotos, where aspherics are
> not needed, would be the area where the older Leica lenses can best
> match the newer ones (at least in a low flare situation).
>
> I think one of the advantages the M series will continue to enjoy in
> terms of performance is the ability of the designers to ignore the
> requirements of AF and IS, which has to be a huge part of current
> optical design for the mainstream companies.
>
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 




Replies: Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] The IIIF still works)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] The IIIF still works)
In reply to: Message from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] The IIIF still works)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] The IIIF still works)
Message from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] The IIIF still works)