Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/09/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Irene followup
From: sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter)
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 06:38:17 -0500
References: <638615B6-2B1D-4A86-85AD-F53CD0A5707F@embarqmail.com> <CF867B64-5D3F-42CE-AF91-1E362ED7F813@frozenlight.eu>

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at 
frozenlight.eu>wrote:

> Glad to hear it was not nearly as a bad as the pre-hurricane hype had led
> to expect. I guess it is better to exaggerate the danger than to underplay
> it.
>

Nathan, I think the evacuations and preparations diminished  the problems.
It was less a storm than they expected, but it was still a storm, and people
can do stupid things.

Having been a news photographer during several lesser and greater storms on
the Gulf coast, I assure you that is true.


-
Regards,

Sonny
http://sonc.com/look/
Natchitoches, Louisiana

USA


Replies: Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] IMG: Irene followup)
Reply from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] IMG: Irene followup)
In reply to: Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] IMG: Irene followup)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] IMG: Irene followup)