Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/09/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 07:10:31 +0530
References: <63C28AFB-46A8-4F3A-ABD1-D58A638C0660@mac.com> <4E84E6E0.4090508@cox.net> <CAH1UNJ2uj+w=MoofcU4yEFApUNdM652-3CCr2qGAccQ=DLRREA@mail.gmail.com> <20110929213658.353c4584@linux-pfy5.site>

Phil,
You are not keeping them alive - buying shares in the secondary market is
akin to buying second hand Leica equipment - nothing flows into the
company's coffers. This is a pure sefish profit play!
Cheers
Jayanand

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Phil Forrest
<photo.forrest at earthlink.net>wrote:

> I was thinking the same thing. Even a few hundred shares wouldn't be
> a big loss at this point but if they regained shareholder confidence a
> little bit of profit could be made. Or maybe just the good feeling of
> possibly helping keep them alive.
>
> I'd like to hear what Leica is thinking regarding this matter.
>
> Phil Forrest
>
>
>
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 06:59:39 +0530
> Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Maybe it is worth a little flutter at $1.69....hardly any downside,
> > maybe a much bigger upside depending on what happens.
> > Cheers
> > Jayanand
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net> wrote:
> >
> > > $1.69, from $30 ~four years or so ago.  Sounds like something I
> > > would own :(
> > >
> > > Ken
> > >
> > > On 9/28/2011 8:56 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:
> > >
> > >> <http://247wallst.com/2011/09/**24/kodak-its-credibility-gone-**
> > >> now-had-viability-trouble/<
> http://247wallst.com/2011/09/24/kodak-its-credibility-gone-now-had-viability-trouble/
> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> George Lottermoser
> > >> george at imagist.com
> > >> http://www.imagist.com
> > >> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/**imagist
> > >> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ______________________________**_________________
> > >> Leica Users Group.
> > >> See
> > >> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<
> http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
> > >> more information
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > ______________________________**_________________
> > > Leica Users Group.
> > > See
> > > http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<
> http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
> > > more information
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil Forrest) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)