Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/09/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?
From: robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier)
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:48:02 -0500 (CDT)
References: <63C28AFB-46A8-4F3A-ABD1-D58A638C0660@mac.com> <4E84E6E0.4090508@cox.net> <CAH1UNJ2uj+w=MoofcU4yEFApUNdM652-3CCr2qGAccQ=DLRREA@mail.gmail.com> <20110929213658.353c4584@linux-pfy5.site> <CAH1UNJ22Q7q40JcraOxzWMwns4pr-PXu9vos3T8tGGqiU1nD=A@mail.gmail.com>

But that raises the price of the shares, just as when a company buys  
back its own shares from the secondary market.


On Sep 29, 2011, at 8:40 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:

> Phil,
> You are not keeping them alive - buying shares in the secondary  
> market is
> akin to buying second hand Leica equipment - nothing flows into the
> company's coffers. This is a pure sefish profit play!
> Cheers
> Jayanand
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Phil Forrest
> <photo.forrest at earthlink.net>wrote:
>
>> I was thinking the same thing. Even a few hundred shares wouldn't be
>> a big loss at this point but if they regained shareholder  
>> confidence a
>> little bit of profit could be made. Or maybe just the good feeling of
>> possibly helping keep them alive.
>>
>> I'd like to hear what Leica is thinking regarding this matter.
>>
>> Phil Forrest
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 06:59:39 +0530
>> Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe it is worth a little flutter at $1.69....hardly any downside,
>>> maybe a much bigger upside depending on what happens.
>>> Cheers
>>> Jayanand
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net>  
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> $1.69, from $30 ~four years or so ago.  Sounds like something I
>>>> would own :(
>>>>
>>>> Ken
>>>>
>>>> On 9/28/2011 8:56 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> <http://247wallst.com/2011/09/**24/kodak-its-credibility-gone-**
>>>>> now-had-viability-trouble/<
>> http://247wallst.com/2011/09/24/kodak-its-credibility-gone-now-had- 
>> viability-trouble/
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> George Lottermoser
>>>>> george at imagist.com
>>>>> http://www.imagist.com
>>>>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/**imagist
>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See
>>>>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<
>> http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>>>>> more information
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See
>>>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<
>> http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>>>> more information
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil Forrest) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)