Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/10/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] This is why there's no 30MP M10...
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:01:13 -0700
References: <CAF8hL-HfjZf966=8PDEMYYMLWH_NHVBe-OBvZ7j-M2P-dXqO9w@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8hL-GLrp2yGUKXYOykMNt0E5DJn9+XP0MR2DUu5KQvrErfxw@mail.gmail.com> <CABXy406ZFRbNvCSkipJjm5qPHchriy1Xc9P0Zgv9tzMtcVyp9Q@mail.gmail.com>
 
I am not arguing against the decision :-) I always feel that 18mp-20mp is at
the sweet spot for 35mm full frame.

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Ken Iisaka <ken at iisaka.com> wrote:

> Besides, most lenses don't resolve that much. So what you have more pixels
> of blur? The real estate on the sensor is better used for extra
> sensitivity.
>
> The direction is going towards that already.
>
>

-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] This is why there's no 30MP M10...)
Message from ken at iisaka.com (Ken Iisaka) ([Leica] This is why there's no 30MP M10...)