Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/10/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] New S lens
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 03:20:00 -0400

And the S2 45mm x 30mm  is not that much different than other digital medium
format's. Not that much smaller. Its just that its significantly bigger than
24x36.

-- 
Mark R.
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/


> From: John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 03:20:13 +0000
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] New S lens
> 
> I know, and that is for 56mm x 56mm rather than 45mm x 30mm
> 
> john
> ________________________________________
> 
> 
> Because on an old Hasselblad 30 is not even wide its a fisheye.
> 
> --
> Mark R.
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> 30mm S is roughly equivalent to 24mm FF
>> http://www.s.leica-camera.com/leica-elmarit-s-30-mm-f-2-8-asph
>> 
>> 35mm S > 28mm FF
>> 
>> 70mm S > 56mm FF
>> 
>> 120mm S > 96mm FF
>> 
>> 180mm S > 144mm FF
>> 
>> I think I read that it will be a zoom next and then more long lenses.
>> 
>> All academic of course ;-)
>> 
>> john
>> ________________________________________
>> 
>> 
>> I just say that because 30 is way wider than a 70. Which makes you think 
>> its
>> super wide.
>> But 30 is so than from a 55.
>> Perhaps someone can do a comparative angle of view to see how that 
>> compares
>> to what we are familiar with in 35mm photography.
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




In reply to: Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] New S lens)