Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/11/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: lens shutters suck
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:39:41 -0800
References: <80734B3E-B2A7-4B6A-B736-2CB611D8F3F9@frozenlight.eu> <CAF8hL-EGJMscfkhF32+wT=i3V8E_ft0o2UhGg9Mwg1RhE2PG6w@mail.gmail.com> <708ACBAB-AE95-448E-8CDB-89D7B5A0A7BE@frozenlight.eu> <CAF8hL-GsnNiP93HbDKHabbZvj+s6kdZpo9O4EpXmtjwFAcm+dw@mail.gmail.com> <923EEE5B-2915-4C50-9D9B-619F36D1263B@frozenlight.eu> <CAF8hL-FbyTjQ1fgaNNH6=2fiaj7WttiGrX3+dQVWT7+YxRy6iw@mail.gmail.com>

Actually, isn't the simplest to spend another $300 for another Fuji 6x9 or
send your defective one to a CLA for a couple hundred bucks?

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Richard Man <richard at 
richardmanphoto.com>wrote:

> Then get one of those 500CM/501CW and some amazing Zeiss glass. You can
> get a 500CM/ an A12 back, a WLF and a 80mm lens for ~$1000. More money for
> sure but the quality will be so worth it.
>
> Or get the Mamiya 6MF. Again for about ~$1000.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at 
> frozenlight.eu>wrote:
>
>> I don't like folders, and when I shoot MF weight is not an issue anyway.
>> I am a big guy ;-)
>>
>> Nathan Wajsman
>> Alicante, Spain
>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
>>
>>
>> YNWA
>>
>>
>>
>> On Nov 15, 2011, at 10:57 PM, Richard Man wrote:
>>
>> > Doesn't a Pentax 6x7 weighs twice as much as the Fuji 6x9? Totally
>> > different kind of beast?
>> >
>> > May be one of those older 6x6 /6x7 folders? They are pretty cheap too.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> It does entice me, but getting this kind of stuff back from the lab
>> sucks.
>> >> I think I will go for a Pentax 6x7 which is probably more reliable.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> nathan
>> >>
>> >> Nathan Wajsman
>> >> Alicante, Spain
>> >> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>> >> http://www.greatpix.eu
>> >> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>> >> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>> >> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> YNWA
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Nov 15, 2011, at 10:45 PM, Richard Man wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Take a look at that large 6x9 negative.
>> >>>
>> >>> It will take quite a bit of work to beat that even with a Leica M9,
>> >> unless
>> >>> you are doing the Paul thing.
>> >>>
>> >>> Worth it? Only you can decide. I probably won't shoot with my -4T or
>> M7
>> >>> much ever again, but I am shooting more XPan than ever before. So if
>> the
>> >>> 6x9 neg entices you...
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at 
>> >>> frozenlight.eu
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Just got back 3 rolls of MF film from the lab in Barcelona, shot
>> with my
>> >>>> Fuji 6x9. Of the 24 pictures in total, 14 are blank frames. And no, I
>> >> did
>> >>>> not accidentally photograph the inside of my camera bag this many
>> times,
>> >>>> since I follow the standard Leica RF practice of not advancing the
>> film
>> >>>> before putting the camera in the bag. I guess the lens shutter is
>> >> sticking,
>> >>>> i.e. not opening about half the time. Given that I only paid $300 for
>> >> this
>> >>>> camera, the fact that it has turned into a paperweight is annoying
>> but
>> >> not
>> >>>> devastating. But it does mean that I am on the lookout for a reliable
>> >> 6x7
>> >>>> or 6x9 MF outfit.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Or I should just stop this film foolishness and get on with life in
>> the
>> >>>> 21st century.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Cheers,
>> >>>> Nathan
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Nathan Wajsman
>> >>>> Alicante, Spain
>> >>>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>> >>>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>> >>>> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>> >>>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>> >>>> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> YNWA
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> Leica Users Group.
>> >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Leica Users Group.
>> >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Leica Users Group.
>> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Leica Users Group.
>> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
>
> --
> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>
>
>


-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>


Replies: Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] OT: lens shutters suck)
In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] OT: lens shutters suck)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] OT: lens shutters suck)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] OT: lens shutters suck)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] OT: lens shutters suck)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] OT: lens shutters suck)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] OT: lens shutters suck)