Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/11/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: lens shutters suck
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:27:56 -0800
References: <80734B3E-B2A7-4B6A-B736-2CB611D8F3F9@frozenlight.eu> <4dcd69c4d31225f3327df849ee7d2570.squirrel@emailmg.globat.com> <CA+yJO1BTffVvhHw2wpHzrgdaN-VyzW4JDZhVHFnniNvjFNrtdw@mail.gmail.com>

I have traveled with Tri-X and let them go through the X-Ray machines up to
twice with no issue. This is with the modern scanners in the last couple
years and US only.

I used to carry a Delta 3200 in the bag just so that I can ask them to hand
check the whole thing and it's not worth it because of the TSA hassles
already.

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> wrote:

> Some examples here, too, if you scroll down:
>
> http://www.kodak.com/global/en/service/tib/tib5201.shtml
>
> Tina
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 5:48 PM, <afirkin at afirkin.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Then I started the Kenyan films: I was very excited about these. African
> > panoramas. The first one I printed (after processing all 6 rolls and
> > contact printing) had strange densities that I had 'tried' to ignore on
> > the contact sheet, hoping it was the plastic I used to hold hte film flat
> > BUT no. The next shot (almost identical) was also 'scarred'. I
> immediately
> > blamed my processing: did I agitate enough? BUT the more I looked at them
> > the less I was convinced. This 35mm film is of course in small metal
> > containers, they were 'bunched' together in the handluggage and there is
> a
> > potential weak point where the felt stops light, but not X rays, so this
> > could explain why the patterns were somewhat irregular: I really don't
> > think my processing would have scarred across the film like this: the 120
> > rolls did not have the same pattern, so once again I think the entire
> > project was ruined by radiation. Helen asked me if I could 'rescue' any
> > and I said "maybe, if I scanned them and 'patched' them up in PS" but in
> > the end why have film and digitize it when you can use digital capture in
> > the first place.
> >
> > So if this is true then you cannot carry film when you travel by air, and
> > this is my major interest in photography. If I cannot use film on my
> > travels I will soon lose any skills I have.
> >
> > I rang a friend last week before come to the USA and he just said: "you
> > should think about getting one of those new digital camera things". I
> will
> > enjoy the darkroom workshop, but there is a sword hanging over the
> > darkroom and the thread holding it is very thin!!
> >
> > Perhaps I need to GROW UP ;-)
> >
> > That became longer than I expected, but kept me awake!!!
> >
> > Alastair
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> www.tinamanley.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>


In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] OT: lens shutters suck)
Message from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com) ([Leica] OT: lens shutters suck)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] OT: lens shutters suck)