Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/12/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I second that. Better than the Zeiss 35-70 f3.4 for Contaxes. On Dec 15, 2011, at 2:58 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote: > I fully agree. It is the only zoom I have ever owned that I considered > equal to prime lenses. > > Cheers, > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > http://www.nathanfoto.com > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ > > > YNWA > > > > On Dec 15, 2011, at 8:42 PM, Tarek Charara wrote: > >> Jim, >> >> It's a very sharp lens, I like it for "everyday use"? >> >> All the best from Paris, >> >> Tarek >> >> http://www.tarekcharara.com >> >> NO ARCHIVE >> >> Le 15 d?c. 2011 ? 20:41, James Laird a ?crit : >> >>> I couldn't find any information on the 35-70 f4 R in the archives. >>> Might be a problem with my searching skills;) Any opinions pro or con >>> on this lens? >>> >>> Jim Laird >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information