Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/12/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 with 18mm--very wide alternatives?
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 06:48:20 -0800
References: <29A03E415C3CF6478A71D0ADBDA7EE57064309@PPD18.sppd.usc.edu>

12 and 15mm CV, 15 and 18mm Zeiss, WATE (16,18,21), and 18mm Super
Elmar.....  All fit and work on FF DIgi-sensors ( or Film...!).

It was never this good on SLR's through the 1990's....and never before this
good on RF cameras, ever.

ASAIK, Leica never differentiated between the Film and M8 / M9 lenses.... 

And for the length of time the M8 was in production. Why would they?

BTW, if you want to know about all those Branded cameras, go ask the
manufacturer....it was not Leica.....

Frank Filippone
Red735i at earthlink.net


For my work the M9 with the new 18mm is ideal. As far as I can tell, there
are virtually no good alternatives in the digital world. Probably a full
frame SLR with a Zeiss 18mm would be good. But much much bigger, and too
obtrusive. And less than full framers seem not to have any very wide angle
lenses made for them. I could use the supplementary lens on my LX3, which
then gets you to 18mm equivalent.

In other words, why no very wide alternatives in the digital world if less
than full frame? Is it the need for microlenses on the sensor since the
angle from the lens is so big?




In reply to: Message from krieger at sppd.usc.edu (Krieger, Martin) ([Leica] M9 with 18mm--very wide alternatives?)