Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/12/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Le 20 d?c. 11 ? 21:18, Nathan Wajsman a ?crit : > I am not in charge of anything, not even the kitchen in my house, > but FWIW, my impression has always been that the pictures for the > yearbook were supposed to be from the year in question. At least in > spirit. > Well, If I take Richard's calligraphy, page 92 of the 2008 edition, and what he showed us of his other talents with his superb Occupy series this year, I think we'd be missing on how a photog may evolve over time. Even 2011 Senoritas are no longer the same as yester years'. And Lluis has changed his BW processing too. Did Bob use MF in the past books? Etc. OTT We've already lost the monthly friendly "challenge" to kick some of us clicking, including me; it would therefore be a pity if Tina's accidental mistake became common practice and we'd simply dig from our archives, without even a theme. Of course, as always, YMMGV Bien cordialement de Metz Philippe, leaving for the kitchen ;-) > Cheers, > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > http://www.nathanfoto.com > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ > > > YNWA > > > > On Dec 20, 2011, at 5:08 PM, Robert Adler wrote: > >> Rules? We don't need no stinkin' rules!! >> Suggested criteria: An image of your newly discovered or >> significantly >> reworked during the calendar year. Like a new "edition". >> Hopefully not offending those in charge, but I think the intent of >> the >> collection is to show our favorite work done during the year, old >> shots or >> new... >> ducking, >> Bob (quack) >> >> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Stasys Petravicius >> <stasys1 at cox.net> wrote: >> >>> yes. Stasys - i was thinking of doing the same- but figured it's >>> against >>> the RULES!! >>> On Dec 20, 2011, at 7:20 AM, Tina Manley wrote: >>> >>>> Uh-oh! I just read Ted's directions for the LUG book. What if the >>> photos >>>> are "captured" digitally during 2011 by scanning them for the >>>> first time? >>>> The ones I was going to submit fit that category but they've been >>>> hanging >>>> in my filing cabinet since 2001!! Am I in trouble? >>>> >>>> Tina >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Richard Man < >>> richard at richardmanphoto.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> What's this phrase mean, "take photos?" >>>>> >>>>> You mean I need to remove my M9-Titanium from the packaging and >>>>> attach >>> the >>>>> companion lens onto the body? Wouldn't that ruin the resale value? >>>>> >>>>> Besides, people keep saying Tri-X is the best for Leica, so >>>>> where do I >>> buy >>>>> them and how do I put it in? >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at >>>>> gmail.com >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> c'mon folks, surely you took two photos this past year... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Leica Users Group. >>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more >>>>> information >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Tina Manley, ASMP >>>> www.tinamanley.com >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more >>>> information >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Bob Adler >> Palo Alto, CA >> http://www.rgaphoto.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information