Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/12/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] photoshop-vs-lightroom
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:43:32 -0500

WTF does WTF  mean?

-- 
Mark R.
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/winterdays/


> From: Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:39:57 -0600
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] photoshop-vs-lightroom
> 
> I assume you jest!  ACR is Adobe Camera Raw.  Google it as "Adobe ACR" to
> get the full picture.
> 
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nathan Wajsman" <photo at frozenlight.eu>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 1:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] photoshop-vs-lightroom
> 
> 
>> OK, so I guess Adobe are just bullshiitting here:
>> 
>> http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshoplightroom/about/
>> 
>> And WTF is ACR? I know, it is some RAW conversion engine deep in the
>> bowels of both Photoshop and Lightroom. The beauty of it all is that I
>> don't have to care about it!!! All I have to worry about is whether the
>> picture is any good! That is how photography should be.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Nathan
>> 
>> Nathan Wajsman
>> Alicante, Spain
>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
>> 
>> 
>> YNWA
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Dec 27, 2011, at 7:41 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>> 
>>> Photoshop is the great image cruncher with a half assed DB tacked on to
>>> act
>>> as a digital contact sheet.
>>> Lightroom is a great DB digital contact sheet with a half assed image
>>> cruncher tacked on.
>>> They are Apples and Oranges as the old LUG used to say.
>>> Or Apples and Pears as the French say better.
>>> 
>>> The only mystery to me is the timing on the thing.
>>> I like most photographers and serious photo enthusiasts I know who went
>>> digital without waiting too long got Photoshop when they got their first
>>> digital camera. If not before. Actually many had Photoshop way before
>>> they
>>> even had their digital first camera.
>>> It was not a super easy program to learn but the weeks turn into months
>>> and
>>> before you know It you've got it at least so its doing what you need it
>>> to
>>> do for you. But next month you'd be better.
>>> By the way its a long way from Photoshop to Elements but most people in
>>> the
>>> 80's and 90's just got a copy of the real big boy Photoshop from a
>>> friend.
>>> Every kid had a copy. It was more popular than pin ball games or the
>>> jungle
>>> Jim.
>>> When you'd meet up with your photographer friends or talk to them you'd
>>> talk
>>> about the latest trick you'd learned on Photoshop. And how your early
>>> Epson
>>> prints were looking which paper you were using which setting.
>>> 
>>> No So all of a sudden you supposedly don't need it.
>>> I can tell you I am very familiar with what ACR can do and its a start
>>> off
>>> point on image crouching. Not an end to itself.
>>> What you have learned on Photoshop this week?
>>> Every time I've put Photoshop aside and gotten distracted by other
>>> programs
>>> I've certainly had to pick it up again and make up for lost time.
>>> -- 
>>> Mark R.
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/winterdays/
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




In reply to: Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] photoshop-vs-lightroom)