Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Scanners
From: tcharara at mac.com (Tarek Charara)
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 02:36:31 +0100
References: <mailman.1273.1326057844.33714.lug@leica-users.org> <19A5F492-9884-431E-A6B0-43466C7EB9FA@netvigator.com>

I like it very much? 

All the best from Paris!

Tarek

-------------------------------------------------
Tarek Charara
<http://www.tarekcharara.com>

NO ARCHIVE




Le 9 janv. 2012 ? 01:09, H&ECummer a ?crit :

> If you can't find a LS5000 at an acceptable price the LS4000 might be an 
> acceptable and cheaper alternative.
> I have that model which I control with Silverfast to my Mac and the 
> results are very good. Here is a sample scan
> of an extachrome slide taken in North China in 1976.
> 
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Howard+Cummer/China70s/_HeavyIndustw.jpg.html>
> 
> Black and white scans equally well.
> Howard (in cold Hong Kong)
> 
> 
>> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 15:14:29 -0500
>> From: Tina Manley <images at comporium.net>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Scanners
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> 
>> I don't think there's anything better for B&W film than the Nikon 
>> LS5000for
>> 35mm or 9000 for medium format unless it's one of the very expensive Leaf
>> scanners.  A dedicated film scanner is going to be much better than a
>> flatbed.  The software makes a big difference, too, and Silverfast is the
>> best I've found.
>> 
>> Tina
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from cummer at netvigator.com (H&ECummer) ([Leica] Scanners)