Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Controversial?
From: billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce)
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:58:01 -0600
References: <0D49E68B-9AA6-46B9-BF31-BC4B34A99E86@sfr.fr> <78EF0F88-A0E6-4CF5-B934-1BADAC9AEFDC@embarqmail.com>

There are what I would consider errors and ommissions on the list, as I 
consider the Xpan, Sony R1 and Panasonic LX2 mia, but I own 50, 38, 33, 26, 
25, 9 and 3 and would like tohave 47 and 28. Now, when do we get the lens 
list?

-----Original Message----- 
From: Ric Carter
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 4:22 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: Controversial?

lists such as this are always wrong and right at the same time

can cause entertaining discussion

today, i own 44, 38, 20, 17, 15, 8, 4, & 1

a couple more, i wish i owned

ric


On Jan 30, 2012, at 4:48 PM, philippe.amard wrote:

> Might be ...
> http://www.photographymonthly.com/Magazine/2010/50-Greatest-Cameras-of-All-Time
>
> Bien cordialement de Metz
> Philippe
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 



Replies: Reply from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] OT: Controversial?)
In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] OT: Controversial?)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] OT: Controversial?)