Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agree, Richard. That was one of the reasons I hesitated to use it. But, when down on my knees, using trifocals, I'm lucky to get it that close. Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Man" <richard at richardmanphoto.com> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2012 5:00 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Crocus Without Flash > But the one without fill should have a little more on the top... > > On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Robert Meier <robertmeier at usjet.net> > wrote: > >> Without the flash is infinitely better. >> >> On Feb 25, 2012, at 4:01 PM, Jim Nichols wrote: >> >> > The Croci were in very poor light. Here is a shot without the fill >> flash. Perhaps, after all, it is the better image, though highlights >> from >> the sun are blown in both of the images. >> > >> > Original, with fill flash: >> > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Crocus85.jpg.html >> > >> > Without fill flash: >> > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Crocus82.jpg.html >> > >> > Comments and critiques welcomed. >> > >> > Jim Nichols >> > Tullahoma, TN USA >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Leica Users Group. >> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > > -- > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >