Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I thought of that, but all of them at a skooch under 400x1.4? If that was the case (all at the same focal length) a 400 prime + 1.4 borrowed and cropped would have made a lot more sense... I'm not convinced the EXIF data is right... But then it's been one of those weeks... Best, Bob On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com>wrote: > That means he is using a 1.4x TC as well... > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Robert Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote: > > What else was weird was he said he borrowed a 200-400 lens from Nikon. > Then > > all the EXIF says 550mm except for the first that says 55mm. Bit of a > > disconnect... > > > > On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Doug Herr <wildlightphoto at > > earthlink.net > >wrote: > > > >> Richard Man wrote: > >> > >> >My point is rather that IMHO, they are pretty good photos for the > piece. > >> >Not the best there is, but hey this is only the New York Times. > >> > >> I thought the photo in the NYT article were rather ordinary and the > >> equipment was gross overkill for the results. I must have had a rough > week > >> too. > >> > >> Doug Herr > >> Birdman of Sacramento > >> http://www.wildlightphoto.com > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Bob Adler > > Redwood City, CA > > http://www.rgaphoto.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Bob Adler Redwood City, CA http://www.rgaphoto.com