Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] POSTCARD: Two, in BW
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:53:57 -0800
References: <0FB7CA4F-D62E-47C4-B0E6-1DF36E600015@sfr.fr>

And both are excellent!

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:34 PM, philippe.amard <philippe.amard at 
sfr.fr>wrote:

> I wonder what film would have fared that "well" without a filter on the
> lens ...
> http://gallery.leica-users.**org/v/Phileica/Switzerland/**
> Engie-All+that+glitters+is+**not+-7483.jpg.html<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Switzerland/Engie-All+that+glitters+is+not+-7483.jpg.html>
>
> and a thought for Jackson Pollock
> http://gallery.leica-users.**org/v/Phileica/Switzerland/**
> Engie-All+that+glitters+is+**not+-7508.jpg.html<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Switzerland/Engie-All+that+glitters+is+not+-7508.jpg.html>
>
> Both may be viewed large
>
> Bien cordialement de Metz
> Philippe
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See 
> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>  more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>


Replies: Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] POSTCARD: Two, in BW)
In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] POSTCARD: Two, in BW)