Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: FF - Lilly
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:19:34 -0600
References: <CAAsXt4NF63eBMR5vwKj14JYOJSTncwu7rS53DoyuzOdORfJJ3A@mail.gmail.com>

On Mar 9, 2012, at 9:12 PM, Robert Adler wrote:

>> From my front yard. My mother-in-law's yartsite (marking of the day 
>> someone
> died) was four years ago today. Her name was Lillian. Unfortunately she
> hated lilies, but she presented me with this today.
> 
> http://www.rgaphoto.com/fleur/content/L1000384-Edit-Edit_large.html
> 
> This was taken with the noctilux. As you can see, the front of the flower
> (where I focused) is out of focus. When I bought the lens and the M9, the
> dealer sent the nocti in for coding and CLA. I asked the dealer's salesman
> to please send my new M in with the lens so that they could be matched. He
> insisted it wasn't necessary because if my new M was checked at the factory
> before shipping, it would perfectly match the M they were going to test the
> Nocti on. Twice I insisted; twice he said it wasn't necessary. He checked
> it before shipping it to me (after it was in NJ for 6 weeks) and said it
> was perfect.
> 
> Obviously it's not. He is sending me a loaner M and 50 summicron while he
> sends my M and Nocti, again, to NJ. Also giving me attitude unfortunately.
> Oh well. Hopefully it will return in 6 weeks and with a happy ending...

Have to ask
was the camera on a tripod?
and
was their absolutely no wind?

Beautiful photograph though

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist







Replies: Reply from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] IMG: FF - Lilly)
In reply to: Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] IMG: FF - Lilly)