Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 75mm Summilux on M9
From: liangjiyang at gmail.com (Kay Yang)
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 20:45:43 -0700
References: <4B7BDC02-8856-4141-8E5D-DBEBA3357794@gmail.com> <BLU0-SMTP631CD7003762DCFF68C6A08C5D0@phx.gbl> <CAF8hL-HdEDPWtBiD-AtjJz9S=Co96E0zK+pe4wX_7smXWwcCQQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+yJO1AwQH4E_P6LndyLJtmGgFcTivm1ivpvnfNHWJJ-q5+O3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABmfTOXteDgy0JQvrzxjPVLddmUXiSGwvY4pQqohpuY8KPfz6g@mail.gmail.com>

It's the best Leica lens ever made. I wouldn't use it simply for the speed.
In fact, I often shoot it at f2 or f2.8. I am drawn to its look rather than
the speed and I am willing to carry the extra weight for that.

On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com> 
wrote:

> The 75/1.4 is actually the hardest M lens to focus; it has less depth
> of field than the Noctilux and the focus requirements are more
> critical.  This makes accurate focus hard.  The 1.25 or 1.4 magnifiers
> are useful but do decrease rangefinder brightness and contrast.  The
> 75 Summilux has quite a lot of focus shift.  If properly adjusted, the
> focus point will be very slightly in front of the rangefinder point of
> focus, but as you stop down depth of field increases and contains the
> point of optimum focus.  If you get it adjusted so that it focuses
> perfectly at f1.4 depth of field does not catch up with the focus
> shift until f 5.6.  I have never seen a 75 Summilux that was built
> during the film era that did not need adjusting to focus properly on
> digital M cameras.
>
> > You have to be willing to practice, practice, practice and delete a lot
> of
> > mistakes.
>
> Practice does really help, and you'll probably still end up with an
> infuriating number of out of focus images, but I agree that when you
> get it right it gives really beautiful results.
>
> > But when you get it right, it is second only to the Noctilux for
> > absolutely beautiful low-light photos with wonderful bokeh.
>
> I think the out of focus rendition from the Summilux is both more
> predictable and better than both the f1 and f0.95 Noctis, but this is
> personal opinion only.  In really low light f1 or f0.95 is simply
> better than f1.4, and although the focus difficulties of both
> increase, I find the Nocti easier to use than the 75 Summilux in
> really dim light.
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/freakscene/75+Summilux/sakura.jpg.html
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/freakscene/75+Summilux/fionn1.jpg.html
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/freakscene/75+Summilux/eggs+web.jpg.html
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/freakscene/75+Summilux/
>
> Marty
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] 75mm Summilux on M9)
In reply to: Message from eazydraw at googlemail.com (Swanny) ([Leica] 75mm Summilux on M9)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] 75mm Summilux on M9)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] 75mm Summilux on M9)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] 75mm Summilux on M9)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] 75mm Summilux on M9)