Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] LUG users happy w/SmugMug?
From: rcmphoto at yahoo.com (R. Clayton McKee)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 18:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
References: <CAEFNq_ahAsvor4PZtNH3TfoStRvOaeqboML02XPK=RzZNj62eQ@mail.gmail.com> <411E3A52-6372-40EF-A9D7-D4B15C315A78@mac.com> <FB06641B-AB2F-4ECE-B25A-D5AC9B8A13BA@frozenlight.eu> <CAMvGeU__Nripu0pj5S59VujV4+NDNAFe_8gxB_zrha--pAtNaA@mail.gmail.com>

Yup.? I pay a hundred and a half.

Quite happily.??? 

Pays for itself quickly if you're pushing print sales hard, more slowly if 
you're casual about it.? For me it's about a wash on the fee but it avoids 
tremendous hassles and dealing with some real pain in the butt people, so 
it's worth every penny.

?
R. Clayton McKee
PhotoJournalist
from somewhere just south of somewhere else...


>________________________________
> From: Bill Nelsch <photobynelsch at gmail.com>
>To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> 
>Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 5:45 PM
>Subject: Re: [Leica] LUG users happy w/SmugMug?
> 
>+1 But I think the pro fees are higher for newcomers - it is their way of
>rewarding loyalty by keeping the fees the same for those of us who have
>been there since the early days.
>
>On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at 
>frozenlight.eu>wrote:
>
>> Very happy here too. I have the Pro package, and have been with Smugmug
>> for several years. I pay an annual fee of $100 as far as I remember, it 
>> has
>> been the same since I joined. No limits on either size or traffic.? The 
>> Pro
>> package allows me to use my own domain, if you are happy with a standard
>> Smugmug name, it is a lot cheaper.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Nathan
>>
>> Nathan Wajsman
>> Alicante, Spain
>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
>>
>>
>> YNWA
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mar 23, 2012, at 9:29 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > On Mar 23, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Benjamin Marks wrote:
>> >
>> >> Any happy or unhappy SmugMug users here?? I am looking for a public
>> place
>> >> to display photos.? Size limits? Fees? IP license gotchas?? I don't
>> mind a
>> >> modest fee if the service is good.
>> >
>> > very happy
>> > most especially
>> > with Lightroom interface
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > George Lottermoser
>> > george at imagist.com
>> > http://www.imagist.com
>> > http://www.imagist.com/blog
>> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Leica Users Group.
>> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>


In reply to: Message from benmarks2005 at gmail.com (Benjamin Marks) ([Leica] LUG users happy w/SmugMug?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] LUG users happy w/SmugMug?)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] LUG users happy w/SmugMug?)
Message from photobynelsch at gmail.com (Bill Nelsch) ([Leica] LUG users happy w/SmugMug?)