Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Only the JPEG. Just stored as an instruction for default (a starting point) with DNG when you open in your Raw converter Cheers, Geoff http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman On 1 April 2012 10:18, Herbert Kanner <kanner at acm.org> wrote: > I enthusiastically second that. I do have a question: does setting a color > balance in the Leica affect the DNG (raw) image or only .jpg out of the > camera? > > Herb > > > I leave the Leica color balance at daylight all the time shooting Raw, >> and set the color in Lightroom. It takes about a second to do, and I >> really like the color that results. >> >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 9:32 AM, dnygr <dnygr at cshore.com> wrote: >> >> > This message was originally HTML formatted. View in a HTML capable >> client >> > to see the original version.\r\n\r\nThis post concerns the discussion >> about >> > Leica vs Zeiss, German vs Japanese. >> > >> > Disclosure: I am a dedicated Leica uses. I use it 98% of the time. I >> love >> > the quality of Leica glass. >> > >> > I do a lot of photography in poor light. Here is where I start to have >> a >> > problem with Leica. Not with the lenses. >> > The problem is not the quality of the lenses. They perform well. >> > >> > It's the Leica sensor. I find the colors are a problem. They are off. I >> > used a Canon 5D I found its color in those situations >> > to be better. I still prefer the Leica however. The size of the Canon >> > annoys me. The large "L" pro lenses annoy me. >> > >> > A friend suggested I use the simple 2.0 Canon lens. Compared to the L >> and >> > Leica lenses it was a cheap purpose. The thing works >> > darn well. It isn't bulky and the colors in the dark remain good. >> > >> > I may try using Aperture instead of Photoshop with the Leica. That may >> > solve some of the color problems. >> > >> > But having shot with the Canon, I feel I got a lot for my money with >> the >> > 35 and still have a lot of change in my pocket. >> > I feel the Leica is less bulky to use. I don't like the mirror delay of >> > the Canon. I like Leica lens quality--the three dimensionality. >> > The Canon however gives me more than I would suspect I'd get for $300. >> > >> > Cheers--Doug >> > >> > ______________________________**_________________ >> > Leica Users Group. >> > See >> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for >> more information >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Sonny >> http://sonc.com/look/ >> http://sonc-hegr.tumblr.com/ >> Natchitoches, Louisiana >> >> USA >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See >> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for >> more information >> > > -- > Herbert Kanner > kanner at acm.org > 650-326-8204 > > Question authority and the authorities will question you. > > ______________________________**_________________ > Leica Users Group. > See > http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for > more information >