Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Buying a Leica lens?
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 02:02:38 -0400

Yes you said what you said and I said what I said.

- - from my iRabs.
Mark Rabiner
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/springdays/


> From: John McMaster <john at chiaroscuro.co.nz>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 17:34:13 +1200
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Buying a Leica lens?
> 
> Yes, but that is not what I said
> 
> john
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> 
> Wide angle zooms have become the dominant optic and Canon is the dominant
> camera so I'd think tens of thousands of them are being used every day to
> make the pix you are seeing every day whenever you click on your news feeds
> or "gasp" page through a paper or magazine.
> 
>> 
>> A lot of pro's use (and are happy with) the Canon 16-35, those I know
>> who are fussy about IQ do not have a good thing to say about it...
>> 
>> john
>> ________________________________________
>> 
>> 
>> There is also the issue of how important is it for the pix you are
>> about to take to come out. If its an important pro job then we know
>> other pros using the glass and nobody is complaining a lot is riding
>> on it but its and informed buy..
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




In reply to: Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Buying a Leica lens?)