Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Apr 2, 2012, at 6:12 AM, scleroplex wrote: > what ever happened to the poor thing's eyebrows? > i diagnose hypothyroidism! > :-) compulsive plucking, all gone, then paint it on... is she anorexic to boot? but the lens is certainly good.... but she would look better if it were not..... Steve > > > From: Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com> > Subject: [Leica] The M9 sensor is not good enough for what????? > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Message-ID: > <CAE3QcF4MZHgh+JfXfscu5rBhXorEoUu+EbEka-9oq--Csc5K7g at > mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I was pretty puzzled at recent discussions comparing the M9 (and M8 is same > resolution of course) output against that from a Sony NEX. I've never shot > the NEX cameras but I know my M9 pretty well. > The Sonys (and others) look to be innovative designs that ought to work > well for many purposes. I personally don't follow the attraction of using > them as ersatz rangefinders with manual lenses (better to shoot them with > thie dedicated lenses and take advantage of their functionality) but hey > I'm no great sample from their target demographic! > > That darn M9 sensor and the modern lenses just don't resolve enough > compared to the new mirrorless wundercameras ;-) > This 100% sample in harsh light (APO 75) NO output sharpening. > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/hoppyman/g/sample-100percent.jpg.html > > Cheers, > Geoff > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information