Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ha ha. Well Mark speaks his mind :-) But honestly, I have never been so impressed by a lens before. Many Leica lens are excellent. I still remember seeing the chromes from the 50'lux ASPH. The clarity, oh! But that SWC Biogon is another class... On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Chris Crawford <chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com > wrote: > Jesus, Richard, now you're going to get Mark to foaming at the mouth > again! Thanks! :D~ > > -- > Chris Crawford > Fine Art Photography > Fort Wayne, Indiana > 260-437-8990 > > http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com My portfolio > > http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com My latest work! > > http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798 > Become a fan on Facebook > > > > On 4/6/12 12:33 AM, "Richard Man" <richard at richardmanphoto.com> wrote: > > >I went to photograph inside a high tech company today for the Faces of the > >SmartWorld > ><http://richardmanphoto.com/Portfolio/FacesoftheSmartWorld.pdf>project. > >The indoor light is not bright enough for Tri-X and I didn't want > >to use a tripod so I was mainly using the M9 with the 50'lux and the 25 > >Biogon ZM. > > > >If you look at the lens diagram, the 25 Biogon ZM does look rather like > >the > >"original" Biogon. Performance wise, it's good. Very good image quality. > >But distortion wise, there is no comparison to the true Biogon SWC. The > >difference is startling. > > > >Next time I'm going to bring a tripod... > > > >-- > >// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Leica Users Group. > >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>