Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti
From: benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney)
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 09:29:03 +0930
References: <CAAsXt4MggD0Led2FwTjZQPvNnWUDzcC0wnC0yUE7skxjQAYDmA@mail.gmail.com> <002301cd15db$2bd89dd0$8389d970$@chiaroscuro.co.nz>

Wide open the point of correct focus should be slightly behind the
focus point (about 2.5mm) but nowhere near as far as yours is.  Did
you send your camera in at the same time?

Marty

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:28 AM, John McMaster <john at chiaroscuro.co.nz> 
wrote:
> I have just tested my Noctilux and 75mm Summilux at closest focussing, both
> tested fine at distance. The Noctilux is spot on but the 75mm is back
> focussing ~50mm and this is after a tweak at Solms....
>
> john
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> My noctilux and M9 are back to NJ for the third time. If you remember, the
> dealer sent them back 3 weeks ago because I complained it was back focusing
> and the dealer finally agreed. Dealer got it back and no change. So back
> again but "the noctilux person is on vacation until the 16th..."
> Stinks...
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)
Reply from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)
In reply to: Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)
Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)