Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Third party M to X adapter (to Simon)
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:54:56 -0400

I wonder which pieces of premium gear I should sell because its bullish this
year as an investment?
How about Zeiss for Hasselblad bellies?
Or Pre ASPH Leica bellies?
One problem I've found with selling a piece of key photo gear I've long used
is after I sell it I reach into my camera bag and its gone! I can't use it
any more.
Its now part of someone else's non liquid net worth.


- - from my iRabs.
Mark Rabiner
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/springdays/


> From: David Keenan <ausdlk at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:33:17 -0500
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Third party M to X adapter (to Simon)
> 
>> Have you not considered the possibility that not everyone can afford a
>> digital Leica M, but maybe has some lenses still kicking around from
>> their film days and would like to make use of them again?  Or the fact
>> that there are only three lenses currently for the Fuji and not many
>> more than that for the Sony NEX?  All cameras systems have there
>> compromises, but most here would agree that Leica M lenses produce the
>> best results in many situations, so why not try to use them on other
>> systems?
> 
> Simon --
> 
> Yes, I have considered this.
> 
> Honestly, Leica glass has appreciated so much in value, you'd be MUCH
> better off selling it and putting toward the XP1 and a system of lenses.
> 
> I seriously doubt that anyone on this forum (short of deep pixel-peeping in
> non-real world tests) is going to see better (i.e., meaningful) results on
> the XP1 with Leica (or any other non-Fuji) lenses.
> 
> But my point really is that manual focusing on the XP1 is a VERY inexact
> process. What good are the sharpest lenses (again, of any make) if the
> photographer cannot precisely focus? And reasonably quickly?
> 
> My point continues that manual focusing on the XP1 (or Sony NEX, Panasonic,
> etc.) is at the very best a fidgety, time-consuming process.
> 
> Again, video doesn't necessarily apply. Nor does if you put on a lens and
> leave it set for infinity all the time, a landscape photographer, perhaps.
> And, and the guy that hyper-focuses an extreme wide angle and never expects
> a subject to be too close or too far away.
> 
> But I seriously doubt that the aforementioned group approaches the
> mainstream group who are enjoying their mirrorless camera of choice, in
> this case the Fuji XP1.
> .
> Dave.
> 
> --
> See my 2012 Picture A Week (PAW) Gallery
> <http://www.dlkphotography.com/paw>originally begun in 2007.
> Please join my photography mailing
> list<http://dlkphotography.us2.list-manage2.com/subscribe?u=3d9dfbb5b18c481753
> 2a37b90&id=4dd441d8fe>
> .
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




In reply to: Message from ausdlk at gmail.com (David Keenan) ([Leica] Third party M to X adapter (to Simon))