Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/05/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] for those interested in Kodak, Apple, Digital Imaging patents, Law, Bankruptcy, etc
From: kanner at acm.org (Herbert Kanner)
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 19:17:06 -0700
References: <D9E75DC7-8A1C-4FBD-93CE-89AEA68BF6C0@mac.com>
 
This being a court finding, a public record, I wonder why so many 
words were redacted. Is there a lawyer among us who can explain that 
to me?

Herb



><http://www.kccllc.net/documents/1210202/1210202120514000000000019.pdf>
>
>Regards,
>George Lottermoser
>george at imagist.com
>http://www.imagist.com
>http://www.imagist.com/blog
>http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

-- 
Herbert Kanner
kanner at acm.org
650-326-8204

Question authority and the authorities will question you.
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] for those interested in Kodak, Apple, Digital Imaging patents, Law, Bankruptcy, etc)