Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/05/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If you can afford a 50AA, you can afford a MM so no one will shoot film with it! On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Chris Williams <zoeica at mac.com> wrote: > Ha, here's where Tech Pan prices rise to $100 a roll. If you can afford a > $7K 50/f2, you can afford a few rolls. > > > > > > Chris Williams > www.zoeicaimages.net > www.rebirthworkshops.com > 504-231-6261 > New Orleans, LA > zoeica at mac.com > > > > > On May 25, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Richard Man wrote: > > ISO 5 film on a heavy duty tripod?! >> >> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Frank Filippone <red735i at earthlink.net >> >wrote: >> >> There are some reports that the lens has more resolution than an M9 or >>> M9m. >>> While this may indicate a future higher resolution digi-M, it also means >>> that the lens is overkill on an M9/M9m. >>> >>> >>> >>> Leica is not stupid... >>> >>> >>> >>> Is there some "advantage" for film users to have this lens in their >>> arsenal? >>> Is this the Holy Grail of film lenses? >>> >>> Is there a film in production that can support the 50AA resolution? >>> >>> >>> >>> Frank Filippone >>> >>> Red735i at earthlink.net >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See >>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for >>> more information >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> // richard >> <http://www.richardmanphoto.**com<http://www.richardmanphoto.com> >> > >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See >> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for >> more information >> > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Leica Users Group. > See > http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for > more information > -- // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>