Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] LR 4.1 question solved
From: hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:56:27 +1000
References: <4FD3BA1B.3010808@cox.net> <8C49282269B34ACA9ED369B4B13357B2@jimnichols> <CA+yJO1A0Cc=WH9WYZ=sEqDSw_d2NL9RXRQGuGuizkvZ5k6c0UQ@mail.gmail.com> <4FD3D61B.8080603@cox.net> <000c01cd4694$95b629e0$c1227da0$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <CAF8hL-GXiCMxmtBjsV4SsijMSsXASxZ5g7eiHBz4OPZMRp1YyQ@mail.gmail.com>

I have LR4.1 and I just rechecked, The "apply auto tone adjustments"
selection IS unchecked by default. You can test this by using the "reset
all default devrlop settings' function if you like.
Martin Evening describes it that way in his book as well. I do recommend
his book as well and I start by setting up with all of his recommendations
whenever I upgrade to a new version.
As far as I recall this was the case with earlier versions of LR as well.
The same default also exists in Adobe Camera Raw 7.1 preferences
The only explanation I can think of (except intentional changing of the
setting by user) is if it was selected for a previous version which has
been upgraded and LR kept the previous settings? That is a guess.
I've never used that function myself.



Cheers,
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman



On 10 June 2012 09:09, Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com> wrote:

> The default should be unchecked, and rightly so. I will be mindful when I
> get the 4.1 update.  It's a "convenience checkbox" that is worse than
> useless.
>
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 4:07 PM, John McMaster <john at chiaroscuro.co.nz
> >wrote:
>
> > I went and looked at my copy of 4.1 (this machine is updated from 2.*
> > through all updates) and it was not ticked...
> >
> > john
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > Thanks, I will do that.  I have his book on LR3.  As nearly as I can
> > tell, the "apply auto tone adjustment" box was not checked as default
> > until v. 4.1.
> >
> > Ken
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
>
>
> --
> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] LR 4.1 question solved)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] LR 4.1 question solved)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] LR 4.1 question solved)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] LR 4.1 question solved)
Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] LR 4.1 question solved)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] LR 4.1 question solved)