Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]That's for the Chinese market, where they write M M (I can say that because I am Chinese) On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:22 PM, philippe.amard <philippe.amard at sfr.fr>wrote: > As Nathan said > > Plus, had you noticed the funny for a colour shot Leica advert, right of > the lady's head ... > > Amiti?s > Philippe > > > > Le 14 juin 12 ? 07:49, Nathan Wajsman a ?crit : > > > Impressive! >> >> Nathan Wajsman >> Alicante, Spain >> http://www.frozenlight.eu >> http://www.greatpix.eu >> http://www.nathanfoto.com >> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws >> Blog: >> http://nathansmusings.**wordpress.com/<http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/> >> >> >> YNWA >> >> >> >> On Jun 14, 2012, at 4:09 AM, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote: >> >> Here is one shot in the field at ISO 3200 - I usually use Auto ISO 3200 >>> as >>> a standard setting - I would use Auto ISO 6400 if Fuji gave that option, >>> which they do not! This is with the 35mm lens at 1/18s hand held. No >>> sharpening, no noise reduction shot as in-camera Fine JPG: >>> >>> http://gallery.leica-users.**org/v/jayanand/album254/_**DSF9946.jpg.html<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/jayanand/album254/_DSF9946.jpg.html> >>> >>> Cheers >>> Jayanand >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:19 AM, B. D. Colen <bd at bdcolenphoto.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> So here is an image shot 6400 ISO, using, I believe, the 35 1.4 @ 1.4 on >>>> the Fuji XPro1. I shot in RAW, converted to JPG, did some very minor >>>> levels adjustment, and NO sharpening, and NO noise reduction. The one >>>> problem with this image, and all other RAW images shot with the Xpro, is >>>> that, quite obviously, Adobe has not yet got the DNG Converter worked >>>> out >>>> quite right for the Xpro files. For now, I am going to shoot JPGs. >>>> >>>> But in terms of the 6400 iso - I've got less than no complaints. When I >>>> am >>>> shooting low light images I am a., not looking for fine micro detail, or >>>> b., planning to carry around a loupe to examine the images. Compare this >>>> to any image from an M8 or M9 shot at 3200 iso, and, for that matter, >>>> compare it to the Fuji 1600 iso film shot in an M. It's great to demand >>>> clean images when shooting digital at 100 or 200 iso, or when shooting >>>> something like Fuji Acros, but an image at 6400? >>>> >>>> http://gallery.leica-users.**org/v/bdcolen/PHOTOS/060212_** >>>> and_Commencement_003<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/bdcolen/PHOTOS/060212_and_Commencement_003> >>>> 0.jpg.html >>>> >>>> >>>> PS - The photo is nothing - just a demonstration. :-) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See >>>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for >>>> more information >>>> >>>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See >>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for >>> more information >>> >>> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See >> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for >> more information >> > > ______________________________**_________________ > Leica Users Group. > See > http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for > more information > -- // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>