Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Are we Anal or what? "The Puddle Jumper" / Re: How about this one?
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 13:56:44 -0700
References: <CAMGHw9B=aWixmXOd4ESpQ3JEeNkKXZmpuCKStbxTSdMk7-vuHw@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8hL-EpYuzLX+e37HiX-8VQxmgq3cfeEuAY9OPC1bTWonTMsA@mail.gmail.com> <433B4E95-C603-4219-9CEA-7C4E6DC7BF69@gmail.com>

Which part was Jim right?

As Nathan, and Robert mentioned, no one was talking about gears.

On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at 
gmail.com>wrote:

> wtf are talking about Richard,
>
> Jim happens to be right.
>
> Steve
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> Steve Barbour
>
> On Jun 17, 2012, at 1:30 PM, Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com>
> wrote:
>
> Jim, did you get off the wrong side of the bed, or are you just upset that
> B&D did not ship you the OM-D? :-)
>
> It's simply a matter of academic curiosity.
>
> I for one, care very much "the story of the shot." Not that knowing it will
> necessarily help me in my photography, but simply that they are interesting
> things to know.
>
> If you want to see some of my photos, regardless of gears, please take a
> look at http://richardmanphoto.com - which actually does not mention any
> gear, except in my blog postings.
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:24 PM, James Laird <digiratidoc at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Really? We are worried about whether or not the 'Iwo Jima' shot or the
> > HCB 'Puddle Jumper' shot was staged? Really? Are we worried that maybe
> > the eyelashes on the guy in the puddle jumper shot might be sharper if
> > we shot them with a Nikon D800 vs D800E? Really? Doesn't this seem a
> > bit ridiculous to all of you? Maybe a bit anal?
> > WHO CARES? They are great photographs. Who cares if they were shot
> > with an M4 and a 50mm Collapsible Summicron or an 800E with a Nikkor
> > 50 1.4? It's STILL a great photograph, isn't it? I've seen great
> > photographs taken with 3.2 MP Minolta cameras that most of us would
> > consider pieces of crap, but the photo...a work of art. Beautiful by
> > anyone's standards.
> > I think we all need to take a deep breath, slow down, and realize once
> > and for all that the photograph is what counts. NOT the camera or the
> > lens or the film or the memory card or CS5 or LR4 or whatever we used
> > to get it. A great photograph stands on its own merit. And we all know
> > that the minute we see it. That's what keeps us shooting. We all think
> > that someday we might be skilled enough or (in the end) lucky enough
> > to be in the right place at the right time with a camera to take a
> > photograph that is eternal. Like HCB. He took thousands of
> > photographs, many of which were probably NOT keepers. But he kept on
> > shooting because he was rich enough or lucky enough to be able to do
> > nothing but take photographs, to do the thing that we all love so
> > much. God, he makes me so jealous sometimes. We all probably wish we
> > could have the chance to do what he did.
> > But most of us can't so we think if we buy X lens and Y camera with Z
> > processor/computer that maybe we can do what he did, oh god if we only
> > could. Really?
> >
> > Just my humble opinion ;)
> >
> > Jim Laird
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
>
>
> --
> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>


In reply to: Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] OT: Are we Anal or what? "The Puddle Jumper" / Re: How about this one?)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] OT: Are we Anal or what? "The Puddle Jumper" / Re: How about this one?)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] OT: Are we Anal or what? "The Puddle Jumper" / Re: How about this one?)