Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica Gallery and the Puddle Jumper
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 11:17:06 -0400
References: <CAEve6XiR9a1PcoEfk51fp2D+w-uZKFeqVMrzxxYDwq3f7QSNzg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFuU78dsvSH2NGhCcO1cLsC=MU-uc+uJTj3-TSBcD2WPfM1UCg@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8hL-GL0MJjZGd2F=K-iWg96C=fmLFs807HM+RXDWzj6_UKWQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFuU78cZcrNn=v6B-qeLn0hv56=1MfsXYMLAbJ5tBmm+uCt2tg@mail.gmail.com>

No, it wasn't the Magnum Contact Sheet (and it's not in that book), but
rather the "HCB Scrapbook" event a few years ago.

HCB is very misleading - remember he said, "I ate the sprocket holes" when
asked hpw come they are missing on one edge.

Look at the sentence in question, he did not say "I did that only once."
Also, in the original French, "I happened to be..." does it have more
subtle meaning? Did the translator do a good job there?

I was all the camp to take that sentence (which I know about) at face
value, until 3+ people on this list said they saw the contact sheet.

So the mystery remains!

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Lew Schwartz <lew1716 at gmail.com> wrote:

> True, but then "I happened to be peeking through a gap in the fence
> with my camera at the moment the man jumped." would be deliberate
> misleading, since you are theorizing that the peeking started some
> time before the moment the man jumped. No? Also, which NYC museum
> event are they talking about? The Magnum contact sheet roll out at
> ICP? That'd be fairly easy to research.
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Richard Man
> <richard at richardmanphoto.com> wrote:
> > Lew, he actually did not outright say it, hence the mystery!
> >
> > The thing is, two-three weeks ago, when this came up, no less than 3
> people
> > said they saw the contact sheet, may be at the same NY museum event. One
> > person, one can be skeptical, two, well then you have to debate the odds.
> > Three? well, unless the presenter was actively trying to trick the
> > audience...
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Lew Schwartz <lew1716 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I was trying to call attention to the text in which HCB states that it
> >> was a one shot, one jump deal.
> >>
> >> -LS
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> --
> -Lew S.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>


Replies: Reply from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] Leica Gallery and the Puddle Jumper)
Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] Leica Gallery and the Puddle Jumper -Richard)
In reply to: Message from scleroplex at gmail.com (scleroplex) ([Leica] Leica Gallery and the Puddle Jumper)
Message from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] Leica Gallery and the Puddle Jumper)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Leica Gallery and the Puddle Jumper)
Message from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] Leica Gallery and the Puddle Jumper)