Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/07/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I never said what the camera was until then ;-) john -----Original Message----- Thanks John, I had seen these two superb photos - and probably commented - but hadn't paid attention to the gear involved or must have thought it was the M9. Ph Tous vos emails en 1 clic avec l'application SFR Mail sur iPhone et Android. ======================================== Message du : 01/07/2012 10:23 De : "John McMaster " <john at mcmaster.co.nz> A : "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> Copie ? : Sujet : Re: [Leica] (tech) You get what you pay for ;-) http://johnmcmaster.com/PESO/Flowers/flowers2012/content/_DSC0020_large.html is D800E with 80mm Summilux john ________________________________________ thanks for this interesting comparison Anyone tried a summilux R on the D800E? TIA Ph Just did some quick tests for a friend: 35mm at infinity Leica M9, 35mm Summilux asph FLE at f2.0 and f5.6 Nikon D800E, Zeiss ZF.2 35mm f2.0 at f2.0 and f5.6 The Leica at f2.0 is comparable to the Zeiss at f5.6 50mm at ~1.4m Leica M9, Noctilux f1.0 at f1.0 Nikon D800E, Nikkor 50mm f1.2 AIS at f1.2 Looks like the Nikon 50mm back focused a little (was done by viewfinder rather than liveview), but the Noctilux sharpness and bokeh is far superior. The Nikon images are quite yellow compared to Leica and the Nikon tends to overexpose, I know to put it 1/3 to 2/3 under what it says but they are still a bit bright. john