Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/07/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Rights to Olympic Photos
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 15:54:59 -0400

Sometimes things get off balance when high end publish relations people are
hired and they need to justify the huge bills they are sending their client.
And also the lawyers.

Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/


> From: Tina Manley <images at comporium.net>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 09:51:04 -0400
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Rights to Olympic Photos
> 
> I've heard several examples like that.  It looks like they would be happy
> to have other people advertise for them!  Makes no sense to me!
> 
> Tina
> 
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Gerry Walden <gerry.walden at me.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Piers
>> 
>> My only comment would be that a school on the Isle of Wight was made to
>> remove rings of flowers made by children, and a florist in a small town in
>> Dorset was made to remove similar rings in the shop window put there on 
>> the
>> day the torch came through. Of very dubious, if any, commercial benefit 
>> and
>> both over the top reactions in my opinion.
>> 
>> Gerry
>> 
>> Gerry Walden
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> www.tinamanley.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Rights to Olympic Photos)