Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/07/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I like #2. The eyes have it! Wonderful portrait no matter the equipment, but definitely an achievement with 1.2. Lovely. Bob Adler On Jul 29, 2012, at 8:19 PM, "Aram Langhans" <leica_r8 at hotmail.com> wrote: > Dug out the 50/1.2 Nikon and strapped in on the D7000 for these. They > were shot at 1.2, and 2 respectfully. The f-stop does not record > accurately on the D7000 for this lens for some reason. The lowest that > will show up is 2.0 and when stopping down, it always shows the next > smallest f-stop, so 2.0 shows as 2.8, 2.8 shows as 4.0, etc. Not sure if > that can be adjusted. > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Aram/su12/m/untitled-3135.jpg.html > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Aram/su12/m/untitled-3130.jpg.html > > Vanishing thin depth of field at 1.2. Been a while since I tried this lens > as my rate of accurately focused shots indoors was dismal, but there was > enough light coming through the window at Kidd Valley I think I got the > focus pretty good. > > comments and criticism welcome. View large. > > Aram > > Aram Langhans > (Semi) Retired (retarded?) Science Teacher > & Unemployed photographer > > "The Human Genome Project has proved Darwin more right than Darwin himself > would ever have dared dream." James D. Watson > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information