Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/08/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] NZ PAW 32
From: benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney)
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 11:41:00 +0930
References: <003101cd7746$ff485940$fdd90bc0$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <10185DB6-21B6-4B30-A0F7-3D6CD8C5CAA9@acm.org> <003301cd774e$e17ca850$a475f8f0$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <CABmfTOU5NsC6-xo8GpjCe4uJx=P6UnLiEnaWbdi4AC7hbgfm4A@mail.gmail.com> <003401cd7761$6b4ace10$41e06a30$@chiaroscuro.co.nz>

It's such a chameleon . . . I have the v1 f1.0 and it can look amazing
or terrible, depending on the background or foreground, the distance
to the subject, and how the highlights in the OOF are distributed.
Whatever the case, wide open there's always plenty of bokeh...

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/freakscene/Noctilux/

Marty




On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:04 AM, John McMaster <john at chiaroscuro.co.nz> 
wrote:
> Thanks Marty, that shot was the v4 f1.0 Noctilux wide open...... I was more
> after the reflection when I took it
>
> john
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> Yours use of colour is tremendous; these are among the nicest colour shots 
> I
> see here.
>
> I really like the idea of this one:
> http://johnmcmaster.com/PAW/2012/32/content/L1007831_large.html but the
> out-of-focus rendition is appalling!  What lens was that?
>
> Marty
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] NZ PAW 32)
In reply to: Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] NZ PAW 32)
Message from kanner at acm.org (Herbert Kanner) ([Leica] NZ PAW 32)
Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] NZ PAW 32)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] NZ PAW 32)
Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] NZ PAW 32)