Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/09/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] So most rumours came true?
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:45:52 +0200
References: <380-22012911721384701@M2W103.mail2web.com><D2F0D2001F654725A299891B4B541EC8@qck8vqhgou8blu><05D49919-3590-4C28-A322-664D724E88FC@btinternet.com><BAY160-W136EC93DC689AB76EC8E78C7940@phx.gbl> <CA+3n+_nR0UZAOmeP37HLA6CMmOxnGaVd4PZh6bGrJFxbJL1mfw@mail.gmail.com> <7D05D03EE4874D00AAF33C5EAF825F52@syneticfeba505>

Dear Ted,

;-)

Always a pleasure read your messages!

cheers
Lluis



El 19/09/2012, a las 21:11, <tedgrant at shaw.ca> <tedgrant at shaw.ca>  
escribi?:

> Hi CREW,
> With all this new stuff you lads are talking about and explaining  
> how wonderful it will be using a Leica??????
>
> I'm really surprised how any of us ever got decent photographs this  
> past 60 years?  I suppose, HCB, DDD and many many others of us were  
> extremely lucky we ever got anything in proper focus without  
> peeking? And our photographs are still revered today.
>
> At one time it was offered, "if you gave 100 monkeys in a situation  
> each a camera, some "might take or make some interesting images?"  
> Now with all this new whiz bang stuff most of us can't afford the  
> camera in any event! It wont require a 100 monkeys to take, maybe? A  
> few interesting photographs? Or one? Because the instrument in hand,  
> it seems, will only take one monkey with lots of money to buy one  
> and the camera will be taking perfect pictures with out even knowing  
> what's happening! Well maybe peeking??????? Peaking???
>
> As in many earlier announcements about improvements etc.? Why not  
> SAVE some of the comments until at least a couple hundred? machines  
> are in the hands of everyday folks like ourselves to find out if all  
> these dinky toy improvements actually give you better "CONTENT  
> PHOTOGRAPHS?" Remember folks that is what photography is supposed to  
> be all about!  "THE IMAGE CONTENT CAPTURED!" By the machine in our  
> hands and and what "WE SEE!" Not the camera guts!!!
>
> Just wondering in my usual state of confusion after being a  
> photographer who "took the picture because it was what I saw in the  
> viewfinder and little white lines?" CLICK!  Neat photo without a  
> thought about what was inside the camera other than? "I did put film  
> in it? Didn't I?"  Just wondering?
>
> Your endearing thoughts most welcome. :-)
> cheers,
>
> Dr. ted :-)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto at earthlink.net) ([Leica] So most rumours came true?)
Message from alal at poly.edu (A. Lal) ([Leica] So most rumours came true?)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] So most rumours came true?)
Message from summarex at hotmail.com (Javier Perez) ([Leica] So most rumours came true?)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] So most rumours came true?)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] So most rumours came true?)