Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/09/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M8 vs. M9 Observations....
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 22:55:59 -0400

The reason why its so hard to compare lenses and cameras nowadays is its
really impossible to start them off at the same place. To take out all the
defaults or adjust the defaults to a so called neutral. Even if you were
able to adjust them to match another camera there is firmware inside the
camera you can't adjust but will change from year to year. Then you have in
effect a new camera. The biggest controversy is over color saturation is
sharpness. As you cant just not unsharp mask at all it leaves you will jelly
(this is where the M8 people claim they don't need to unsharp because of no
anti alias filter and back and forth)

In a way it doesn't make any difference as not only are you not shooting
slides you're not shooting negatives either when you shoot digital. When you
click the shutter it is far from the final product though it seems many wish
it was and pretend that it is. People pretend they're shooting slides as
they can't bare the idea of doing anything. They want the picture to be
their cameras fault.
Any digital file even a jpeg you open it up and decide what it needs and
give it to it its pretty straightforward and does not involve anything
convoluted. You should in most cases end up with exactly what you want.
If its a little over saturated there are several ways to desaturate it to
your liking. In camera or just a bit later.

Mark William Rabiner


> From: Frank Filippone <red735i at earthlink.net>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:22:30 -0700
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] M8 vs. M9 Observations....
> 
> I realize all of that..... but I was curious why the M8 and M9 do not put
> out relatively the same, given that Leica set the profiles for both.
> 
> Maybe the question is... If you had an M8 and an M9 with the same lens, and
> took a picture with the same factory standard (default) camera and LR
> settings, would the images be pretty much identical?  Consider saturation
> and "vividness"  as criteria.....
> 
> Images were captured as dng compressed files.
> 
> Frank Filippone
> Red735i at earthlink.net
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+red735i=earthlink.net at leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+red735i=earthlink.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of 
> Mark
> Rabiner
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 7:06 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] M8 vs. M9 Observations....
> 
> Yes you can adjust the preferences in the adobe camera raw so there is less
> color saturation or maybe even just vividness. That does nothing to the
> image itself until you open it. Then you cans save it as a jpeg or whatever
> you want.
> Or if you adjust things in your camera, most of them which effect how your
> jpegs are coming out or previews of raw which are the same thing.
> So really there is no such thing as a digital camera which is gives more
> saturated color than another. It all depends on how you have it adjusted.
> Both the camera and the software which stores and opens your pix.
> 
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
> 
> 
>> From: Frank Filippone <red735i at earthlink.net>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:49:57 -0700
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Subject: [Leica] M8 vs M9 Observations....
>> 
>> Had an M8 for about 3 years,  Got a new to me M9 a few months ago.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I noted on the M9 that  LR found and used an embedded camera specific
>> image profile (in the image file itself, I think).  The M8 used one
>> that came from Adobe, but needed to be turned on inside LR and LR
>> never found an embedded profile for the M8.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> The images on the M9 are significantly more saturated and vivid in
>> their colors than the M8.  ( maybe too saturated?)
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Is this someone else noted and is the way it is or do I have some M9
>> adjustment set wrong?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Frank Filippone
>> 
>> Red735i at earthlink.net
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




In reply to: Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] M8 vs. M9 Observations....)