Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/10/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] THE 617 tests, something is very wrong here
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:27:58 -0700
References: <CAF8hL-GXaio+z9hBDOQoYcVL8CE9jF5zBqMrEAYpmfsp=7DCAA@mail.gmail.com> <CCA5BEA9.24FAA%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Ha ha, I never did that one, but on the Hassy, I did load the film backward
once or twice - so no film images!

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at 
rabinergroup.com>wrote:

> I loaded my Hasselblad backs wrong the first few years I used them. I
> didn't
> put them under the tab but let the film just rest over the tab. So I'd got
> the left edge soft and felt like I had to shoot everything way stopped
> down.
> I finally learned my lesson from an assistant. Should have gotten the Ernst
> Wildi book straight on.
>
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>
>
> > From: Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com>
> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> > Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 04:30:49 -0700
> > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> > Subject: [Leica] THE 617 tests, something is very wrong here
> >
> > First the caveat, these are "high" resolution scan from the Epson 3200,
> not
> > my usual Nikon LS-9000, but trust me on this, the results don't look that
> > different. I'm having trouble getting the LS-9000 to scan the two halves
> > correctly sfor stitching so Epson it is.
> >
> > The camera was set as level and neutral as I could, and then I used some
> > front rise to take less of the road, and more of the subjects.
> >
> > Second, something terribly wrong with my techniques, as the left edges
> from
> > all 3 lens are markedly softer than the right. I have made sure that the
> > negs are as flat as possible on the scanner holder, and this is visible
> on
> > the negs also. This probably mean I did something wrong somewhere. I
> > noticed that the SH 617 has front swing and the lensboard was ever so
> > slightly might not have been parallel (but the amount is very minor), and
> > it may very well be that the film plate was not set parallel enough. So
> > this is probably a user error.
> >
> > Third, even at the best sharpest areas (on the right), things don't "pop
> > out sharp," unlike for example, the negs from the XPan.
> >
> > I am having a dreadful feeling that someone can make this setup sing, but
> > that someone may just not be me :-(
> >
> > I applied 20% sharpening with LR4.2, with the radius and detail set up
> > their defau
> > 150mm Fuji @F32
> > http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/20121018-Scanned-8.jpg
> >
> > 210mm Symmar-S @F32
> > http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/20121018-Scanned-9.jpg
> >
> > 90mm Fuji SWD @F32
> > http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/20121018-Scanned-10.jpg
> >
> > --
> > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>


Replies: Reply from leowesson at gmail.com (leo) ([Leica] THE 617 tests, something is very wrong here)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] THE 617 tests, something is very wrong here)
In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] THE 617 tests, something is very wrong here)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] THE 617 tests, something is very wrong here)