Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:18:59 -0600
References: <CCDBE992.26D48%mark@rabinergroup.com>

There's flash, and then there's FLASH!

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark at rabinergroup.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9


> Wrong guy half my work is with flash at least before digital.
>
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>
>
>> From: Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:51:06 -0800
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9
>>
>> Mark, if you just go to http://richardmanphoto.com, the home page 
>> slideshow
>> is either M9 or the XPan. You can tell easily: pano is XPan, non pano is 
>> M9.
>>
>> Oh wait, that's right, you don't like flash. Sorry. OK, here are some 
>> links
>> I posted here in the last few months:
>>
>> Nitt Witt Ridge, Cambria
>> http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/20121112-L1017378-Edit.jpg
>> my first mag cover:
>> http://www.bbimedia.com/store/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=42_56&pro
>> ducts_id=543
>>
>> http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/Beach-2012-S/content/images/large/L1017052.jpg
>>
>> Not quite Manhattanhenge: 
>> http://www.richardmanphoto.com/PICS/L1016364.jpg
>>
>> etc.
>>
>> My "Voice of the 99%"  Leica M9 images have won Merit Awards in the B&W
>> Magazine, and 2nd Place in the Soho Gallery in NYC Annual competition 
>> etc.
>> Those and $3.50 get me a cup of chai at Starbucks.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Mark Rabiner 
>> <mark at rabinergroup.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Can we see a URL on some m9 shots Richard I've looked at your site an 
>>> cant
>>> find them the only shot I know you did with the camera was Brians 
>>> birthday
>>> pic. I'm sure you're great with the camera and would love to see them.
>>>
>>> Mark William Rabiner
>>> Photography
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>>>
>>>
>>>> From: Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com>
>>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:22:32 -0800
>>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9
>>>>
>>>> No offense to Tina, for every stock photographer that makes money with
>>>> Leica, there are 10 billions that use Canikon.
>>>>
>>>> For every photojournalist that cut their teeth with a Leica M3 or M6,
>>> there
>>>> are gazillions that use Nikanon.
>>>>
>>>> You count all the photos hanging on galleries or all the stock photos
>>> right
>>>> now, most of them are not done with Leica equipments.
>>>>
>>>> A Leica M 240 will not do any good in the hands of someone who does not
>>>> understand the light and composition, bokeh be damn.
>>>>
>>>> Me? The M9 is my go to camera. For other people, who am I to tell them
>>> that
>>>> my set of 'luxes are the finest picture taking lens ever. Well, at 
>>>> least
>>>> for dinky 35mm size.
>>>>
>>>> Chances are I will pick up a 4x5 to go with my 617 at some point and my
>>>> $500 lens will eat the lunch off the $10,000 Noctilux...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:16 AM, <tedgrant at shaw.ca> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> A very interesting topic and conversation. I can only offer from
>>> experince
>>>>> of shooting for magaines, wire services, commercial clients, Ad 
>>>>> agencies
>>>>> and any number if various clients.
>>>>>
>>>>> Only once was there a question. The assignment required shooting on 
>>>>> 4X5
>>>>> size film. I showed them a number of 35 Kodachromes shot wth Leicas.
>>> AND?
>>>>> :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> They said .... "OK go with your gear it will work perfectly!" :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> cheers,
>>>>> Dr. ted  :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "George Lottermoser" <
>>> imagist3 at mac.com>
>>>>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 10:59 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Nov 28, 2012, at 11:38 AM, jon.streeter wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  A friend of mine told me in the '70s that art directors didn't take
>>>>>>> photographers seriously unless they were shooting with Nikons,
>>> Hasselblads,
>>>>>>> and a few other well-known brands.  I never worked with an art
>>> director, so
>>>>>>> I took his word for it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  ----- Reply message -----
>>>>>>> From: "Greg Rubenstein" <gcr910 at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Simple explanation for all this tech and test stuff: use the right
>>> tool
>>>>>>> for what you're trying to accomplish regardless of brand. You know
>>> what
>>>>>>> works for you -- and your clients, who hire vision and results, not
>>> brands
>>>>>>> and data sheets.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> both statements have proven true in my experience.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Art directors" hire "talent"
>>>>>> More often than not the "best talent" use the "best tools"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sometimes the art directors (and their agencies and clients) can't
>>> afford
>>>>>> the best talent.
>>>>>> they then try and hedge their bets by specifying that at least "the
>>>>>> talent" use "the best tools."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> George Lottermoser
>>>>>> george at imagist.com
>>>>>> http://www.imagist.com
>>>>>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/**imagist <
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>> See
>>>>>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<
>>> http://leica-users.org/mailman
>>>>>> /listinfo/lug>for more information
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See
>>>>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<
>>> http://leica-users.org/mailman/
>>>>> listinfo/lug>for more information
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 




Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)