Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/12/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Cameras Real Pros Use
From: billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce)
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 22:57:40 -0600
References: <20121202040706.BNSI26743.eastrmfepo102.cox.net@eastrmimpo210>

Each sensor upgrade requires new electronics. It might be possible to 
replace both, but it would be way too hard for the camera companies to kill 
potential sales of the newer better model.

-----Original Message----- 
From: jon.streeter
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 10:07 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Cameras Real Pros Use

Why can't bodies be made to accept plug-in sensors so one could upgrade not 
just with firmware but with hardware?

Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone

----- Reply message -----
From: "EPL" <manolito at videotron.ca>
To: <lug at leica-users.org>
Subject: [Leica] Cameras Real Pros Use
Date: Sat, Dec 1, 2012 3:36 pm


For me, the deal killer with the digital M cameras thus far has been that
they start out very very expensive when New but their resale values drop
like those of cattle diagnosed with Mad Cow disease.

In this regard (never mind whether or not they are reliable or measure up to
the competition), they are different than just about every other Leica ever
made.

They go from pricey/scarce to obsolete/clearance items in less than 5 years,
it seems.

Emanuel


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 



Replies: Reply from chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com (Chris Crawford) ([Leica] Cameras Real Pros Use)
In reply to: Message from jon.streeter at cox.net (jon.streeter) ([Leica] Cameras Real Pros Use)