Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/12/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Comparison of DMR to Nikon D800E the cheap nikon 28-80
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 00:45:42 -0500

Ok sorry the 75 lux.

Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/


> From: Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 20:05:06 -0800
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Comparison of DMR to Nikon D800E the cheap nikon 28-80
> 
> Mark sez:
> 
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> ....
>> And in that same class of money I got a 90mm f2 Summicron M at another
>> juncture.
>> Some even on this list have declared that a hunk of glass on front of a
>> camera is just not worth that much cash. Richard of instance.
>> My dream lens a 120 f4 CFI Makro Planar T* came true for me at one point.
>> And a 100mm f3.5 CFi  Planar  T* both for my Hasselblads.
>> 
> 
> Are you speaking my name in vain? :-)
> 
> Actually, what I said, was that I prefer the 85/2 ZM more than the 90/2 AA.
> So I sold the latter and kept the former. The weight is similar but for my
> use the 85/2 balances better and I prefer the ZM close range performance.
> 
> and then I bought one of my cardinal rules of not keeping more than one
> lens in too close focal length and kept the 75/1.4 lux because...
> 
> Well, if there is any lens that define Mandler, it's the 75/1.4 'lux.
> 
> -- 
> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Comparison of DMR to Nikon D800E the cheap nikon 28-80)