Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks john > -----Original Message----- > > I just thought out that no matter the scanner, it is still the same scanned > image format from either a SWC or a 500 neg. the scanner has no idea....and > therefore should give the same quality result regardless of what took the > image.... > > I have no idea why the results were different.... except the lens is > different.....thus your conclusion. > > Frank Filippone > Red735i at verizon.net > > > -----Original Message----- > > Native 3200dpi scans (3 passes) on a Minolta Dimage Scan Multi Pro, the > detail in a 49MP (7000 pixels square) image was not as sharp/detailed as my > digital Ms (albeit only 18MP), tonality is a different thing ;-) However, > for me, > the M Monochrom fills that gap. > > John > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > Explain more about your comment of the 3200dpi scans.......... What > > is different? Was the scan done in native mode (not the total of some > > 4x800DPI or other math assisted scans?) > > > > I understand that you had the body checked out.... I agree that this > > should have ensured the body was OK..... > > > > Note: SWC lenses ( 38mm Biogon) is certainly one of the best volume > > made lenses ever created.....and wed permanently to a body is a killer > combo! > > > > Frank Filippone > > Red735i at verizon.net > > > > 3200dpi scans are a different matter IME. The 500C/M had been back to > > Hasselblad UK for servicing. > > > > john > >